Evaluation of Short term forecast of Timber price in Chhattisgarh.

 

D.P. Singh1, Deepak Kumar2, S.K. Yadaw3, and Alok Shrivastava4

1S.G. College of Agriculture and Research station Jagdalpur, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur

2Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur

3Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur

4College of dairy Technology, Raipur, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur

 

 

ABSTRACT

Trend and forecasting equation for timber price on the basis of regression factor were designed for each forest circle. Grade wise of timber price and its comparison with different species were also calculated. For fitting of trend and short tern forecasting of various timber price data for Teak , Sal , Bija , Shisham , Khamhar , Saja and Dhawra species were collected from each forest circle of  forest department of Chhattisgarh . The data were collected for a period emergence of new state Chhattisgarh i.e. from 2001 to 2005. The analysis was done for circle wise, grade wise and state level records. The best fitted trends and forecast was observed for Kanker followed by Sarguja and Bilaspur circle, where as positive trends and forecast was observed.

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Forest provides a wide range of goods and various ecological services to us. They are rich source of biodiversity. A large number of poor tribal people living in and around the forest areas depend mainly on these forests for their livelihood. The human and animal both are directly or indirectly depends on natural resources for their daily requirement energy in term of food and fuel. India has a recorded forest area of 76.52 million hectares that is 23.28 per cent of its total geographical area. The ownership of these forest areas rests largely with the government. It is estimates that 92.47 percent of the recorded forest area is owned by the forest departments, 3.18 percent by other government departments, 2.45 percent by corporate bodies, and 1.91 percent by others (Sagreiya 1994). Presently the forest area divided into six-forest circle viz., Raipur, Bilaspur, Surguja, Durg, Kanker and Jagdalpur. The Chhattisgarh has 16 districts. The state has three agro climatic zones, viz., Chhattisgarh plains, Bastar plateau and Northern Hill Region spreading over a total geographical area of 13.602 million hectare, forest occupies almost 1.85 million ha.

 

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

The data for present investigation were taken from the seven major species maintained at all forest circle of forest department of Chhattisgarh. The secondary data on timber price (Rs.) of major timber species of Chhattisgarh were collected circle wise for whole state. For the study timber price data of seven species were collected for the period 2001-2005 i.e., from the emergence of new state. The data set recorded was classified into girth wise, length wise and grade wise. Four girth classes viz. 51-60, 61-75, 76-105, 106-120 cms and four length classes (0-2m, 2-3m, 3-5 up-5) were categorized into five grades (grade 1 to grade 5). Least square technique was adopted to observe price trend. The model used was

 

 


1st Linear regression model

       

2nd degree parabolic regression model

 

For testing of significance of regression coefficient, ‘t’ test was carried out using the following formula:

t = with n-2 degree of freedom

Where = Estimated value of

        = Standard error of

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

Forecasting equation for Chhattisgarh forest circle

Short term forecasting analysis carried out for major seven timber species of Chhattisgarh. All the forest circle of Chhattisgarh analyzed along with the circle wise and state as a whole have been included for description of results. Performance of each circle of the seven species has been described in terms of trend and short term forecasting by least square technique. Estimated forecast income for all forest circles of Chhattisgarh is presented Table (1) best fitted forecasting equation for different species for Teak (Tectona grandis) were estimated among best followed by Dhawra (Anogeissus latifolia) and Saja (Terminelia tomentosa).

 

Table 1. Short term forecast of income (Rs) through different species for next two years

Species

Year

 

2006

2007

Teak

3058930

3157820

Sal

682110

687300

Bija

888645

952580

Shisham

1297220

1363410

Khamhar

599935

620260

Saja

494710

506340

Dhawra

467270

494580

 

The critical study of tables revealed that regression coefficients were highly significant (P<0.01) for Teak (Tectona grandis) while Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo),  Saja (Terminelia tomentosa) and Dhawra (Anogeissus latifolia) species were significant at 5%. Highest R2 (94.51%) was obtained for Teak followed by Dhawra (86.41%) while lowest R2 was obtained for Sal (Shorea robusta) (51.51%).

 

References

Krishana Kutty, C. N. 1998. Timber price trends in Kerala. KFRI Research Report. 160:pp 51-85.

 

Kurzfristige, H. 1989. Short term timber market forecosts. Forest and Holz 44 (11): 281-286.

 

Leskinen, P and Kangs, J. 2001. Modelling future timber price development byusing expert Judgments and timbe series analysis. Silva Fennica 35 (1): 93-102.

Linden. M and Uusivuori, J. 2000. Modeling timber price forecasts and stumpage market expectation in Finland. Journal of Forest Economics 6 (2):131-149.

 

Matsushita, K. 1992. The seasonal fluctuation of the forest products price. Memoirs of the faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University 28: 153-163.

 

Matsushita, K. 1993. The seasonal fluctuation of the forest products price. Memorie of the facultyof agriculture, Kagoshima University. 29: 121-133

 

Yin, R.S. and Yin, R. S. 1999. Forecasting short term timber prices with univriate ARIMA models. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 23 (1): pp 53-58.

 

 


 

Table2. Regression factor for estimating price of different species

Species

Intercept

Regression co efficient

S.E.(b)

t cal

R2

Teak

-195314.41

98.889**

13.75

7.19

0.9451

Sal

-25818.885

13.271 NS

7.433

1.78

0.5151

Bija

-127364.96

63.934 NS

32.052

1.99

0.5701

Shisham

-131479.92

66.189*

16.664

3.97

0.8402

Khamhar

-40172.014

20.324 NS

7.603

2.67

0.7043

Saja

-22835.069

11.629*

2.762

4.2

0.8552

Dhawra

-54316.589

27.309*

6.25

4.36

0.8641

** Significant at 1 % level of significant

 * Significant at 5 % level of significant

  NS Non significant


 

Received on 20.12.2009

Accepted on 28.12.2009   

© A &V Publication all right reserved

Research J.  Science and Tech.  1(3): Nov. Dec. 2009: 108-109