Length-weight Relationship of Indian Major
Carps from Kumhari Reservoir Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Raghav M. 1,
Dixit S. 2
1Department of Fisheries, College of Agriculture, I.G.K.V.,
Raipur (C.G.) India
2Asst. Professor, Dept. of Zoology, Govt. D.B.Girls College
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, C.G., India
ABSTRACT
126 samples of C. catla, 129
samples of C. mrigala
and 163 samples of L. rohita were
sampled in Kumhari reservoir, Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
India to study the growth parameters of length-weight. Log transformed
regression were used to test the allometric growth.
It was observed that the growth in weight is almost proportional to the cube of
its length in L. rohita
while C. catla
and C. mrigala
were slightly deviated from the cube of its length. The values of slope b =
2.8018, 3.4576 and 2.6275 were calculated for C. catla, L. rohita and C. mrigala respectively.
INTRODUCTION:
The relation between
weight and length for fish in a given population can be analyzed by measuring
weight and length of the same fish throughout their life or of a sample of fish
taken at a particular time(Wootton,1998) Length-weight relationships of fish,
in general, are important because they: (a) allow an estimate of the condition
of fish; (b) allow the estimation of biomass from length observations; (c)
allow the conversion of growth in- length equations to growth-in-weight; and
(d) are useful for comparisons among regional areas of life histories of a
species (Goncalves et al.,1996). Length-weight
relationships were also originally used to provide information on the condition
of fish and may help to determine whether somatic growth is isometric or allometric (Ricker, 1975).Length-weight-relationship has
been commonly used for two different purposes. Firstly, to describe the
mathematical model between length and weight so as to derive one from the other
(Wootton, 1990). Since length can be easily and
accurately measured, the data on length are available in various studies. It is
highly valuable in cases where weight can be determined from length already
known and vice versa. Secondly, length-weight relationship is used to compute
the departure from the expected weight for length of individual fish or a group
of fishes as indications of fatness or degree of well being of fish, this
relationship is called “Condition factor” (Wootton,
1990) The study of length- weight has its applied value in fish biology. The
significance of the study in fishes is to assess the growth of fish in
different environments (Mirza et al., 1988) In application of the length-weight relationships to
define a population, fish length is measured and predicted average weight in
assigned to all fish in a given length group. This is often faster and more
convenient than weighing fish individually, especially when large number of
live fish must be sampled. Length-weight relationship is used in commercial
scales and population assessments (Steeby et al ., 1991: Ali et al ., 2000).
Length-weight
relationship allows prediction of weight from length in yield assessments (Pauly, 1993). The growth in animals is considered in terms
of increase in volume. The volume is represented by weight, which is related to
the cube of linear dimension. It is therefore, true that a relationship exists
between length (linear dimension) and weight in animals (Kellicott,
1908).
The relationship between weight (W) and
length (L) typically takes the algometric formula W = a L b , or in
linear form log a + b log L, where a and b are constants estimated by
regression analysis. If fish retains the same shape it grows isometrically and length exponent “b” has the value b =
3.0. a value significantly larger or smaller than b =
3.0 shows algometric growth (Bagenal and Tesch, 1978). A value less than b = 3.0 shows that fish
become heavier for its length as it grows.
The present study is a sequence of this chain
and is dealing with length-weight relationship of Catla catla, Labeo rohta and Cirrhinus mrigala. It is for the first time that
these species are being studied from this point of view in Chhattisgarh, India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
In Kumhari reservoir 126 samples of C. catla measuring 29.8 cm. to 45.7cm,
129 samples of C. mrigala
measuring 33.2 cm to 53.4 cm and 163 samples of L. rohita
measuring from 25.8 cm to 43.4 cm were collected during March 2009 to June
2009. Fishes are directly collected from the landing site, weight of fishes
were taken with the help of electrical digital balance (MP-3000 Chyo, Japan) to nearest 0.01gm. All measurements were made
from tip of the snout to the longest caudal fin ray on fish board having a
millimeter ruler.
The length-weight data were analyzed
according to the method given by Le Cren (1951)
W
= a L b as log W = log a + b log L,
Where, W = weight of fish,
L = length of fish and ‘a’ and ‘b’ are
constants.
Separate equations were calculated for Catla catla, Labeo rohta and Cirrhinus mrigala.
RESULTS:
The relationship between wet body weight (W)
and total length (L) is exponential having the general form Y = a xb or W = a L b. When
the data is transformed into logarithmic form (Fig.1), a linear relationship is
obtained having the general form
Log 10W = Log10 a + b Log10 L.
C. catla:
- Log W = 2.1205 Log L-2.8018
The value of ‘b’ = 2.801
L. rohita:
- Log W = 2.4519 Log L-3.4576
The value of ‘b’ = 3.457
C. mrigala:
- Log W = 1.9107 Log L-2.6275
The value of ‘b’ = 2.627
DISCUSSION:
The values of “b” for the fishes C.
catla, C. mrigala were 2.8018 and 2.6275 indicating a slight
deviation from isometric pattern of growth in these fishes. Sarkar
et al. (1998) made a similar study on
C. mrigala which spawned in bundh
and the hatchery reared stock and reported an allometric
growth. Desai and Shrivastava (1990) observed that C.
mrigala
from Rhind reservoir (Uttar Pradesh) did not follow
the ‘cube law’ exactly because the exponential value (b) was found to be 2.91. Vaitheeswaran and Venkataraman (2008) worked on the length-weight
relationship of Odonus niger collected from the reef islands of Gulf of Mannar by SCUBA diving for a period of six months form
January 2004 to June2004. The slope value (b) estimated for Odonus
niger male was found to
be 2.1601 and for female 2.2508 which show that females are closer to cubes law
in comparison to males. Shayak (2005) studied on Length-weight
relationship of Suffamen fraenatus (Latreille) and
Zenodon niger (Ruppell) and found that the value of ‘b’ for Suffamen fraenatus varies from 2.435 to
2.950 at different regions. The value of ‘b’ for Zenodon
niger varies from 2.0855
– 2.7376. Relationship between total length and total weight in balistids is not significantly different in males and
females.
However
in case of L. rohita the value of “b” is little
more than 3 shows isometric growth pattern. In the present study, C. catla and C. mrigala
exhibited a slight deviation from isometric pattern of growth but L. rohita exhibited isometric growth
pattern. Sunil Kumar et al. (1999)
opined that the exponential values for the endemic catfish, Horabagrus
brachysoma
do not significantly differ from 3.
Fig.1:
Correlation between length and weight of major carps in Kumhari
reservoir
REFERENCES:
Ali,
M., A. Salam and F. Iqbal, 2000.
Weight-length and condition factor relationship of wild Channa
punctata from Multan. Punjab Uni. J. Zool., 15:
183-189
Beverton M.A. & Holt
S.J. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations, U.K. Ministry of
Agriculture and Fisheries: Fisheries Investigation Series 2(19): 533.
Desai, V.R., Shrivastava, N.P. 1990 Studies on age, growth and gear
selectivity of Cirrhinus mrigala
(Hamilton) from Rihand reservoir, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J. Fish 37(4):305-311
Gonçalves, J. M. S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiri, J., Canario, A. V.
M. and Erzini, K. 1997. Weight–length relationships for selected fish species of small–scale demersal
fisheries of the south and south–west coast of Portugal. Fish. Res., 30,
253–256.
Haresh, K. 2006. Length-weight relationship of cyprinid fish Rasbora
daniconius (Hamilton-Buchanan) from Saravathi reservoir, Karnataka. Zoos’Print Journal 21(1):
2140-2141
Hile, R. 1936. Age and growth of the Cisco leucichthys
artedi (Lesueur) in the
lake of Northeastern highlands Wisconsin.
Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 48: 311-317.
Jhingran,
V.G. 1952. General length weight relationship of three major
carps of India. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India. 18: 449-460.
Mercy, T.V.A. and Thomas, K.R. 2002. Length-weight
relationship in Puntius denisonii (Day). Indian journal of fisheries. 49
(2):209-210.
Mirza, A.M., I. Ahmad and M.R.
Mirza,1988. Biologia,34:201-207
Pathak, S.C. 1975. Length-weight relationship, condition factors
and food study of Labeo calbasu
(Hamilton) from Soni reservoir (Madhya Pradesh). J. Inland fish. Soc. India
8: 58-64.
Pauly, D., 1993. Editorial. Fishbyte
section. Naga, The ICLARMQ,16: 26.
Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of
biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish Res. Bd. Canada.,
191: 203-233.
Rounsefell,
G.A. and Everhart, W.H. 1953. Age and growth in Fisheries Science, John
Will and sons, New York. 297- 327.
Shayak,
S. 2005. Studied on Length-weight relationship of Suffamen
raenatus (Latreille,
1804) and Zenodon niger (Ruppell,
1835) Indian J. Fish. 46(2):
191-193
Steeby,
J.A., R.L.Busch and C.S., Tucker, 1991. A length-weight relationship for channel catfish grown under
commercial conditions. The Prog.
Fish Cult.,53: 57-60
Sunil Kumar, G., T.V.A. Mercy &
K.C. John 1999.
Length-weight relationship of
the catfish Horabagrus brachysoma
(Gunther).
Indian Journal of Fisheries 46(2): 191-193.
Vaitheeswaran1T.
and VenkataramanV.K. 2008
Length-Weight Relationship of Odonus niger ( Ruppell,
1836) Tamilnadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal
Sciences 4 (2) 48-51
Wootton, R.J., and Gill, H.S.,
1990. Ecology of teleost fishes.
Chapman and Hall, Lodon.
Wootton, R.J., and Gill, H.S.,
1998. Ecology of teleost fishes.
2nd.Ed. Dordrecht: Kulwer.
Zafar,
M. Mussaddeq, Y. 2003. Weight-Length and condition
Factor Relationship of Thaila, Catla catla from Rawal
Dam Islamabad, Pakistan, Pak. J. Bio.
Sci. 6 (17): 1532-1534.
Received on 16.11.2009
Accepted on 29.11.2009
© A &V Publication
all right reserved
Research J. Science
and Tech. 1(3): Nov. Dec. 2009: 110-112