Process Analytical Technology (PAT): An Initiative
Objective for Pharmaceutical C-GMP for the 21st Century
Hiren M. Marvaniya1, Divyesh J. Vanparia2, Renu
Chauhan2 and Dhrubo Jyoti
Sen1
1Department
of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Shri Sarvajanik Pharmacy College, Gujarat Technological
University, Arvind Baug,
Mehsana-384001, Gujarat, India
ABSTRACT:
Process
analytical technology is one of the
objectives contained in the Initiative for Pharmaceutical cGMPs
for the 21st Century published by the Food and Drug Administration as a mechanism to design,
analyze, and control pharmaceutical manufacturing processes through the
measurement of Critical Process Parameters which affect Critical Quality Attributes. As a direct consequence of the "cGMPs for the 21st Century" initiative, FDA released
its PAT initiative; few pharmaceutical companies are willing to talk about
their efforts to implement PAT. To encourage industry for PAT implementation
FDA introduced the "safe harbor" or "research exemption"
concept which is designed to encourage the industry to investigate tools that
will provide increased process information without the fear of having a
negative impact on the ability to release products that meet all aspects of the
company's current quality control strategy. PAT focuses on the use of in-line testing using various
tools like near infrared, Raman, or other physiochemical techniques as a
primary means of process monitoring. PAT
tools and its applications like Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Raman
Spectroscopy in powder blending. Use of PAT in process
development by implementation of NIR,
Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR), Raman and
Focused Beam Reflectance (FBRM).
1. INTRODUCTION:
Process Analytical Technology
(PAT) has
been defined by the United States Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) as a mechanism to design, analyze, and control pharmaceutical
manufacturing processes through the measurement of Critical
Process Parameters (CPP) which affect Critical Quality Attributes (CQA). Process
analytical technology
is one of the objectives contained in the Initiative for Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century published by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA-USA) on September
2004. The goal of Process Analytical Technology is: "To understand and
control the manufacturing process, which is consistent with our current drug
quality system: quality cannot be
tested into products; it should be built-in or should be by design."
As a regulatory framework, PAT will encourage the rapid development and
implementation of innovative pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality assurance
practices. In R and D and product development, PAT tools will be used to gain
greater understanding of the chemistry and physics of the manufacturing
process, enabling tomorrow’s new products to move into the market faster and
easier with more effective and efficient processes.
In routine manufacturing, PAT will enable continuous and real-time
quality assurance to ensure consistently high product quality and performance,
batch after batch1-6.
With the discussed
technology, regulatory and business issues, have there been changes that will
encourage the implementation of process analytical technology? The answer to
this question is yes. As a direct consequence of the "cGMPs
for the 21st Century" initiative, the pharmaceutical industry is
experiencing pressure from the regulator to address concerns around limited
process understanding, process inefficiencies and continuous process
improvement through the adoption of PAT. Since FDA released its PAT initiative,
few pharmaceutical companies are willing to talk about their efforts to
implement PAT. To encourage industry for PAT implementation FDA introduced the "safe
harbor" or "research exemption" concept which is designed to
encourage the industry to investigate tools that will provide increased process
information without the fear of having a negative impact on the ability to
release products that meet all aspects of the company's current quality control
strategy. Technology vendors says that many of their pharma
customers are in the planning stages of adopting PAT, but few have actually
implemented new manufacturing technology and they are in testing phase6.
Novartis is running sensor
technology side-by-side with the old process and doing lot of pioneering
cutting edge work. Once a company learns how to apply the key fundamental types
of analytical control technologies effectively to one process and product then
the knowledge can be transfered to others. TechniKrom has implemented PAT in critical liquid
handling/blending steps, such as buffer supply, pH adjustment, LC gradient
elution, and solvent feeds. The company helps clients monitor process operations
and demonstrate that variability in feeds leads to variability in production
yields. Eli Lilly researchers presented some ideas about the
analytical methods that could be adapted for real-time analysis of steps in the
pharmaceutical manufacturing process. These methods include Fourier
transforms infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for reaction analysis, Near-IR (NIR)
spectroscopy to measure product dryness and uniformity, HPLC, GC, NMR
spectrometry, and MS for reaction analysis and product identity, Ultrasound to
measure sample granularity. NIR use has been increasing in PAT-style
testing and has been particularly useful in on-line analysis. Multiple
measurements is possible with a single NIR instrument and will able to follow a
variety of processes in a chemical reaction simultaneously such as changes in
reactant concentration, byproduct formation, and product generation which
further allows to make minor adjustments to the process on the fly. Likewise,
strong differences in the NIR spectra of various polymorphs of a single API
allow scientists to quantify polymorph formation during both preformulation and formulation processes. This ability is
critical to a drug’s success, because subtle changes in form can result in
significant differences in drug behavior in vivo. Astra
Zeneca described how new Raman
spectroscopy instrumentation is making extensive inroads into the
pharmaceutical manufacturing sector. According to them it is a highly selective
method that allows researchers to easily and accurately determine the active
pharmaceutical ingredient (API) content of a formulation while largely ignoring
the physical parameters of the samples or sampling conditions. As an example,
they cite a study in which aspirin tablets were assayed for both the API and
the main degradation product, salicylic acid. The study compared the results
obtained using Raman spectroscopy with those achieved using more standard HPLC
method and found a good correlation between the two methods. To understand or
know what PAT is, one has to look outside pharma to the chemical industry which offers an excellent
resource for process analyzer expertise. Scientists at Sigma-Aldrich
Biotechnology used a DOE approach to develop a cell culture medium optimized
for a variety of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, which
biopharmaceutical firms use to produce protein-based biologics. The researchers
used statistical software to identify the best-performing culture media in
their arsenal and develop methods to further increase cell growth and productivity.
New equipment, tools (e.g., SOA, XML), or
applications may be needed to enhance data acquisition and analysis.
Infrastructure, databases, and software should enable easy data mining. New
methods (e.g., MVDA, DoE, process modelling)
including knowledge base maintenance must be implemented to enhance data and
process analysis4.
From a business
perspective, increasing operational efficiency in manufacturing is clearly of
interest. This may occur through cycle time reductions and increasing process
yields. There is strong belief that variability reduction will be added by
increased process capability and by minimized risk of producing out of
specification product. Because whenever process variables deviate from the
specifications, the result will be the loss of one or several batches and an
extensive investigation process, which all adds up to
very long cycle times. All of these identified issues can be positively
impacted through the use of process analytical technology. Designing in PAT
upfront can offer substantial, long-lasting benefits for optimizing
productivity across an organization. Process analytical technology (PAT) is a
key enabling technology to deliver huge savings. It has been estimated that
reducing inventory levels across the pharmaceutical industry to those already
achieved by the very best pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities could deliver
one-off cash release of $76 billion. The key components of this
knowledge-based approach are better understanding of the product manufacturing
process, data analysis, process analytical tools, process monitoring, and
continuous feedback during the manufacturing process. The prominent techniques
of PAT is online monitoring, which means it’s not only recording information,
but it’s also closing the loop and making adjustments to the process as the
product is being manufactured. In other words, the ability to analyze the
production stream is pointless if you can’t respond to what the results are telling
you. While process monitoring traditionally involved temperature, pressure,
flows, pH and other physical parameters, PAT focuses on the use of in-line
testing using near infrared, Raman, or other physiochemical techniques as a
primary means of process monitoring. The data retrieved would provide
information on the properties of blends, cores, and other stages in the
process. Through the use of probes in the process, uniformity, drying, and
mixing endpoints, and other targeted stages can be pinpointed to a high degree
of certainty. Sampling error would be minimized with in-line probes placed
strategically through out the production process.
Unlike the batch processing common on today’s drug manufacturing, PAT will
allow continuous process streams to be digitally measured, monitored, and
controlled. By reducing the need for trial and error, FDA regulators expect
that PAT will allow companies to more easily improve the manufacturing process
and thereby reduce product development times. Without strong manufacturing
operations, many of the new drugs will produce less revenue than their full
potential as a result of longer-than-necessary process start-up and scale-up
times, too many lost batches, process instability and quality problems, and
fines and recalls. PAT contributes in offering solution to these issues to
greater extent. With PAT system Bacterial Endotoxin
Testing (BET), microbial growth and presence testing, ion chromatography, etc
can be converted to on-line or at-line testing methods with no human intervention.
Labor-intensive laboratory preparation and testing will be Outmoded as the
automation sequencing is refined and standardized. The increased process
information with PAT will lead to increased process understanding and better
product1-5.
1. Preparation of a formal project plan; submit for
approval
2. Identification and setup of toolsets necessary for
project implementation
3. Identification of product process specifications and
limits
4. Identification of at-line or in-line or on-line process
controls and tests
5. Acquisition of necessary information and data
6. Preparation and delivery of a CPP analysis report
assessment report
5. APPLICATIONS OF PAT:
There are several types of PAT
applications that can accompany the lifespan of a product or process. The
drivers, challenges and benefits associated with these types of methods can be
very different from process research and development through to full-scale
production. Some methods are only applied to the initial phases of the
development with the goal of defining and understanding critical process
parameters or product quality attributes. In this early phase of process
development, a broad range of PAT methods can be used to gain process
understanding, with no intention of retaining all possible methods during the
transfer to full-scale production manufacturing. This phase is often called
process optimization – finding the most efficient and robust operating
conditions that allow the process to produce quality product. The requirements
for hardware and the procedures are typically aligned along those of other R
and D technologies. In these types of applications, only a subset of
stakeholders are involved in the PAT implementation compared with the number
involved in implementation for a full-scale production plant. For example,
maintenance, automation and control, and quality organizations may not be
involved in multi-purpose systems used in the research and development
environment. The applicable project phases might be reduced to ‘project
identification’ and ‘application development,’ with some modified aspects of a
short-term ‘implementation phase,’ but without the need for a routine
operations phase.
The next stage of process development is
typically the scale-up phase. The goal of PAT in this phase is to continue to
gain process knowledge and/or to verify scalability of the process by comparing
process data obtained during initial development with pilot-plant or full-scale
data. Depending on the scale, more stringent requirements for safety,
installation and procedures are typical, especially when actual manufacturing
equipment is utilized5.
Finally, PAT tools can be used in
commercial manufacturing, either as temporary methods for gaining process
information or troubleshooting, or as permanent installations for process
monitoring and control. The scope of these applications is often more narrowly
defined than those in development scenarios. It will be most relevant for
manufacturing operations to maintain process robustness and/or reduce
variability. Whereas the scientific scope is typically much more limited in
permanent installations in production, the practical implementation aspects are
typically much more complex than in an R and D environment. The elements of
safety, convenience and reliability validation and maintenance are of equal
importance for the success of the application. There are some applications are
describe below.
5.1 The use of PAT in powder blending process
It was examined
whether Raman spectroscopy can be used as PAT tool for the in-line and
real-time endpoint monitoring and understanding of a powder blending process. A
screening design was used to identify and understand the significant effects of
two process variables (blending speed and loading of the blender) and of a
formulation variable (concentration of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API): diltiazem hydrochloride) upon the required blending time
(response variable). A Soft Independent Modelling of
Class Analogy (SIMCA) model was developed to determine the homogeneity of the
blends in-line and real-time using Raman spectroscopy in combination with a
fiber optical immersion probe. One blending experiment was monitored using Raman
and NIR spectroscopy Raman spectroscopy not only allowed in-line and real-time
monitoring of the blend homogeneity, but also helped to understand the process
better in combination with experimental design. Furthermore, the correctness of
the Raman endpoint conclusions was demonstrated for one process by using a
second independent endpoint monitoring tool (NIR spectroscopy).
5.2 The use of PAT in process development
Process
Analytical Technology (PAT) is a system for design, analysis, and control of
manufacturing processes, based on continuous monitoring/rapid measurements of
critical quality and performance attributes of raw material, intermediates and
products.
5.2.1 In-line FT-IR for Monitoring an
Asymmetric Hydrogenation Reaction
In-line FT-IR technology was evaluated for real time
monitoring the hydrogenation process at both lab and pilot plant scales. The
FT-IR probe was inserted directly into the reaction vessel. Figure 1 shows the
representative spectra collected during hydrogenation reaction. Clearly, the
FT-IR can be used to distinguish between the starting material enamine amide and product freebase. By using multivariate
statistical (chemometric) methods of Multiple Linear
Regression and Partial Least Squares, as well as simple peak ratio data treatment,
the real time reaction profiles of the enamine amide
and freebase can be obtained (Figure 2). The data showed excellent agreements
between the FT-IR and HPLC results and demonstrated the feasibility of using
FT-IR to determine the end of reaction at pilot plant scale7.
5.2.2 Process analytical Technology for
monitoring a crystallization process
As an example, multiple in-line techniques were applied during process
development of compound MK-A, which can exist
as several polymorphs (A, B and C) with close thermodynamic
stability. Figure 3 shows the setup of the crystallization vessel with three
in-line analytical probes immersed: attenuated
total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), Raman and Focused Beam
Reflectance (FBRM)9.
Figure3. The 1L Vessel with FT-IR FBRM
and Raman Probes immersed for crystallization development
ATR FT-IR was used to
monitor the solution concentration of the MK-A compound during crystallization.
FBRM can be used to detect the point of nucleation during crystallization.
Figure 7 shows the real time profiles of fine count (1-10 microns) by FBRM
during crystallization of MK-A using unmilled and
milled material as seed (Fig. 5 to 7).
5.2.4 In-line NIR for Monitoring of an API Drying Process
The final
step of preparation of the novel Carbapenem
antibiotic, Ertapenem Sodium involves a drying
process, in which the wet cake is dried to target organic solvent and water
level to yield the final active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Ertapenem is hygroscopic, thermally labile and readily
degrades. Accordingly, in-line Near-IR spectroscopy was implemented for
monitoring this drying process at manufacturing scale to minimize the sample
handling and product degradation. NIR peaks necessitate the use of chemometrics for quantitative analysis. Using a calibration
model developed by the Partial Least Squares method, NIR was able to reliably
determine the water and residual solvent levels during Ertapenem
Sodium drying. An example of the results obtained is shown in Figure 8. The
data illustrate excellent correlations between NIR and reference methods Karl
Fischer (KF) and Gas Chromatography (GC)8,10.
(Fig- 8)
The challenges for the
pharmaceutical sciences are expanding over time as we seek to address
increasingly complex medical needs and health care expectations.
Technical innovation in
the pharma industry’s manufacturing sector has moved
at a snail’s pace, with many methods technicians use for process analysis
remaining largely unchanged for the past three or more decades.
The implementation of
Process Analytical Technology is set to change this by bringing real-life
benefits and improvements to many pharmaceutical processes. The aim of PAT is to
generate product quality information in real-time. The advantages of PAT are
many and varied.
One thing required by companies is they must be
convinced that PAT makes good business sense before they will adopt
organization-wide changes that, from a process and regulatory perspective, will
change the way they do business. Perhaps the most persuasive argument for
introducing PAT is a sense of inevitability. As can be seen in the above
discussion, the use of PAT techniques can be a huge benefit to those who choose
to use the technology9
7. REFERENCES:
1.
Chauvel, J.P.; Henslee,
W.W. and Melton, L.A., Teaching Process Analytical Chemistry; Anal.Chem. 2002, 74, 381A–384A.
2.
Clevett, K.J., Process Analyzer Technology; Wiley-Interscience; New York, 1986.
3.
Callis, J.B.; Illman, D.L. and Kowalski, B.R., Process Analytical Chemistry; Anal. Chem. 1987,
59,624A–631A.
4.
Process Analytical Technology, ABB and compny, Rev2006(03)
5.
Bakeev K.A., Process Analytical Technology,
Blackwell Publication (2005) 1-37.
6.
FDA Draft Guidance on Process Analytical Technology, Aug. 2003.
7.
www.cpac.washington.edu/nessi/nessi.html
8.
Eriksson, L.,
Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N. and Wold, S., "Multi-
and Megavariate Data Analysis, Principles and Applications."
1st Edition, Umetrics Academy, June 07,
2001, Ch 3-4.
9.
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6419fnl.html
10. Workman
J., Koch M. and Veltkamp
D.J., Process Analytical Chemistry;
Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2859–2876.
Received
on 26.11.2010
Accepted on 15.12.2010
© A & V Publication all right reserved
Research
J. Science and Tech. 2(6): Nov.
-Dec. 2010: 129-133