Challenges Facing Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Conceptual Approach

 

Mithun Bhowmick*, Tamizharasi Sengodan, Sivakumar Thangavel

Nandha College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India

 

ABSTRACT:

Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) have become a proven technology throughout the past two decades. TDDS offers significant benefits compared to other, more conventional dosage forms; it is non-invasive, painless and more convenient for the patient; it avoids first-pass metabolism in the liver; it is not affected by food intake or gastric acidity; and there is the possibility of immediate withdrawal of the treatment in case of toxicity. In addition, TDDS enable controlled release of the drug and provide a steady blood level over a long term duration ranging from a few hours to one week. Despite the advantages, of TDDS there are some important obstacles and challenges that TDDS faces. The extent and rate of percutaneous drug absorption and transportation are influenced by various factors including skin physiology, physicochemical properties of drugs and excipients, as well as fabrication and design of the delivery systems. The goal of this article is to review some of these important obstacles and challenges that transdermal drug delivery system faces and to discuss how these relate to transdermal products.

 

KEYWORDS: Challenges, Transdermal drug delivery systems, skin physiology, Physicochemical properties of drugs and excipients

 

INTRODUCTION:

The transdermal drug delivery approach is not without its problems and design challenges. A major problem is the slow penetration of compounds through the skin. The skin has an extremely low permeability, so large molecules cannot readily pass through.

 

The most demanding problems represent conflicts. The conflict here is:

1.         The skin must not let foreign or otherwise dangerous substances enter from the outside. In order to meet this requirement, its outermost structure is designed to act as a closed valve - especially to high-molecular-weight molecules.

2.         The skin must be open to the intentional transport of drugs from the outside, in order for the patient to receive optimal treatment. Many of these drugs are high-molecular-weight molecules.

 

Despite the advantages, transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) are not clinically justified for all drugs. TDDS is further limited by the inability of the large majority of drugs to diffuse passively through the intact skin at therapeutic rates due to great barrier imposed by skin’s outer stratum corneum layer. The cornocytes are held together by desmosomes, which confer structural stability to the stratum corneum. The intercellular matrix is composed primarily of ceramides, cholesterol and fatty acids that are


assembled into multi-lamellar bilayers. This unusual extracellular matrix of lipid bilayers serves the primary barrier function of the stratum corneum.

 

Molecules are believed to diffuse across skin following a tortuous pathway in which transport between bilayers can occur at bilayer-bilayer interfaces or other sites of structural disorganization. Ablation of stratum corneum increases permeability of skin several hundred folds.

 

Consequently the daily dose of drug that can be delivered from a transdermal patch is less than 20 mg, effectively limiting this route of administration to potent drugs.1,2,15

Today’s transdermal drug delivery systems are technically limited by the size (e.g., molecular weight) of the molecule that can be successfully moved through the skin and into the body. This "limiting" molecular weight that can be successfully delivered transdermally is therefore a measure of the progress of development of transdermal delivery systems. As transdermal systems evolve, it is expected that they will become capable of delivering drug molecules of ever-increasing size and complexity. If this "limiting molecular size" is plotted against time, the resulting profile would be expected to assume the shape of an "S" curve.

This S-curve for transdermal drug delivery systems addresses only one system function (although it is a very important one): the capability of the system to deliver higher-molecular weight molecules. The "X" point on the S-curve indicates that the transdermal systems of today are in the "infancy" stage of their possible evolution (Graph 1). A major challenge for designers, scientists and researchers to discover how to deliver an entire range of larger-molecule therapeutic agents through the skin, in a manner that adds value for users of transdermal patches and similar devices.7

 

Graph.1 Functinal Performance of transdermal drug delivery system

 

LIMITATIONS OF RESEARCH, EXPERIMENTATION AND MODELING

The conduct of research, scientific experimentation and process modeling to resolve the conflict described above ("Large molecules cannot, yet must, enter the skin") have been historically ineffective, and are rarely responsible for major product breakthroughs. There is a lack of understanding of how transdermal delivery really works. Modeling approaches for predicting transdermal drug delivery have had generally poor predictive power.

 

The skin itself is a rather complex, heterogeneous membrane; its penetration pathways and skin lipid-structure are not well understood. In many current delivery systems, penetration enhancers increase drug transport through the skin. An important step would be to develop a better understanding of the functioning of penetration enhancers in the stratum corneum lipid structure and in the drug penetration pathway.

 

The researcher’s aim is to develop models that incorporate all these factors and effects, and to use the models to predict systemic drug levels likely to result from a given drug delivery system. Unfortunately, research in this area has proven to be slow and relatively ineffective, and it does not effectively support the conception and development of next-generation delivery systems.8

 

Selection of Drug Candidate for Transdermal Drug Delivery:

Judicious choice of drug substance is the most important decision in the successful development of a transdermal product.3,5

·        The effective concentration (dose) of the drug should be low (≤ 20mg).

·        A drug with short biological half life is a much better candidate for transdermal delivery.

·        Melting point: - should be < 200 şC.

·        The drug should have reasonably wide therapeutic index so that individual variability in skin absorption would not pose too much problem for dosage adjustment.

·        The drug should have an extensive pre-systemic metabolism.

·        The drug as well as other additives should be essentially free from skin irritation.

·        Immunogenicity:-the drug should not stimulate an immune reaction in the skin.

·        More is the molecular weight less will be the diffusion rate hence low molecular weight drugs are preferable (<  1000 Daltons).

·        The drug should not be irreversibly bound in the subcutaneous tissues.

·        A lipid water partition coefficient (log Kp) should be in the range -1.0-4.0 for optional transdermal permeability.

·        The free acid or base should be chosen so that partitioning into the skin is optimized otherwise ionized drug generally penetrate the skin poorly where as unionized form penetrates rapidly (Table 1).

 

Table 1: Ideal Properties of Drug candidate for Tdds

PARAMETER

IDEAL PROPERTIES

Dose

Should be low (< 20 mg/day)

Half life

10 hour or less

Molecular weight

< 1000

Partition coefficient

log P (octanol-water) between -1.0 and 4.0

Skin permeability coefficient

> 0.5×  10-3 cm/hr

Skin reaction

Non irritating and non-sensitizing

Oral bioavailability

Low

Therapeutic index

Low

 

ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF SKIN:

 It is  necessary  to  understand  the  anatomy,  physiology,  physicochemical  and biochemical  properties  of  the  skin  to  utilize  the  phenomenon  of  percutaneous absorption successfully. The skin of an average adult human covers a surface area of nearly 2.0 m2 and receives about one-third of the blood circulating through the body.

 

Microscopically skin is composed of three main histological layers: epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissues (Fig. 1). The epidermis is further divided into two parts; the non-viable epidermis (stratum  corneum)  and  the  viable  epidermis.  The  viable epidermis  is  divided  into  four  layers,  viz.,  stratum  lucidium,  stratum  granulosum, stratum spinosum and stratum germinativum.

 

Fig.1: Cross-section of human skin

 

Stratum corneum (SC) and epidermis: the main barrier to percutaneous absorption:

The SC consists of multiple layers of horny dead cells, which are compacted, flattened, dehydrated and  keratinized.  The  horny  cells  are  stacked  in  highly inter digitated  columns with 15-25  cells  in  the  stack over most of  the body.  It has a density of 1.55 gm/cc. The SC has a water content of only 20% as compared to 70% in physiologically active stratum germinativum.  It exhibits regional differences over most of the body and is approximately 10-15 µm in thickness. However the thickness may be 300-400 µm on friction surfaces such as the palms of hand and soles of feet. 

 

The viable epidermis is an aqueous solution of protein encapsulated into cellular compartments by thin cell membranes, which are fused together by tonofibrils. The viable epidermis has a density near that of water. The germinal (proliferative) layer above dermis undergoes cell divisions producing an outward displacement of the cell towards the surface. As the germinal  layer moves  upwards,  it  changes  shape  into  a more rounded form with spiny projections and appears as a stratum spinosum. After the  germinal  layer  has  raised  12-15  layers  above  its  point  of  origin,  it  becomes flattened  and  the  basophilic  nuclear  material  is  dispersed  throughout  the  cells  as granules. The layer is referred to as stratum granulosum.

 

The  stratum  lucidium  layer, which  lies  just below  the  stratum corneum,  is  the site  where  nuclei  disintegrate  and  keratinization  and  sulphahydryl  rich  matrix formation  takes place. Eventually it moves upwards  to  form  the stratum corneum.  It should  be  pointed  out  that  the  epidermis  contains  no  vascular  elements.  The cells receive their nourishment from the capillary beds located in the papillary layers of the dermis by diffusion of plasma and serum components (Fig.2).16

 

Fig. 2: Stratum Corneum

 

Dermis: The site of systemic absorption :

The  dermis  is  0.2-0.3  cm  thick  and  is made  of  a  fibrous  protein matrix, mainly collagen, elastin and reticulum embedded in an amorphous colloidal ground substance. It is  divided  into  two  distinct  zones:  a  superficial  finely  structured  thin  papillary  layer adjacent to the epidermis and a deeper coarse reticular layer (the main structural layer of skin). The dermis is also the locus of the blood vessels, sensory nerves segments of the sweat glands and pilosebaceous units.  The  blood  vessels  supply  blood  to  the  hair follicles,  the glandular  skin  appendages  and  the  subcutaneous  fat  as well  as  the dermis itself. It protects the body from injury, provides flexibility with strength, and serves as a barrier to infection and functions as a water-storage.14,16

 

Subcutaneous fatty tissue:

Cushioning the epidermis and dermis is the subcutaneous tissue or fat layer where fat is manufactured and stored.  It acts as a heat insulator and a shock absorber.  It essentially has no effect on the percutaneous absorption of drugs because it lies below the vascular system.18

 

Skin appendages:

The skin has several types of appendages.  These  include  hair  follicles  with sebaceous,  eccrine  and  apocrine  sweat  glands  and  the  nails.  An average human  skin surface is known to contain on the average 40-70 hairs follicles and 200-250 sweat ducts per square centimeter area. These skin appendages occupy only 0.1% of the total human skin surface. The eccrine sweat glands (2-5 million) produce sweat (pH 4.0-6.8) and may also secrete drugs, protein, or antibodies. Their principal  function  is  to aid heat control; approximately  400  glands  per  square  centimeter  are  particularly  concentrated  in  the palms and soles.

 

Sebaceous glands are most numerous and largest on the face, forehead, ear, on the midline of the back and on anogenital surfaces. The palms and soles usually lack them. The glands vary in size from 200-2000 m in diameter. The larger ones are found on the nose. They secrete an oily material known as sebum from cell disintegration. Its principal components are glycerides, free fatty acids, cholesterol, cholesterol esters and squalene. It acts as a skin lubricant and a source of stratum corneum plasticizing lipid and maintains an acidic condition on the skins outer surface (pH-5).18

 

PATHWAYS OF TRANSDERMAL PERMEATION:

Permeation can occur by diffusion via:

1      Transcellular/intracellular permeation, through the stratum corneum

2      Intercellular permeation, through the stratum corneum

3      Trans-appendageal permeation via the hair follicles, sebaceous and sweat glands.

 

The first two mechanisms require further diffusion through the rest of the epidermis and dermis. The third mechanism allows diffusional leakage into the epidermis and direct permeation into dermis. For drugs penetrating directly across the intact stratum corneum, entry may be Transcellular or intracellular. The relative importance of these alternatives depends on many factors, which include the time scale of permeation (steady state Vs. transient diffusion), the physiochemical properties of penetrant (pKa, molecular size, stability and binding affinity, and its solubility and partition coefficient), integrity and thickness of   stratum corneum, density of sweat glands and follicles, skin hydration, metabolism and vehicle effects (Fig. 3).17

 

Fig. 3:Simplified diagram of stratum corneum and two micro routes of drug Penetration

 

MECHANISMS OF TRANSDERMAL: PERMEATION:

For a systemically active drug to reach a target tissue, it has to possess some physicochemical properties which facilitate the sorption of the drug through the skin and enter the microcirculation.  The rate of permeation, dq/dt, across various layers of skin tissues can be expressed as :

 

Where, Cd and Cr are respectively, the concentrations of a skin penetrant in the donor phase (stratum corneum) and in the receptor phase (systemic circulation), and Ps is the overall permeability coefficient of the skin and is defined by :

Where ,     Ks = partition coefficient of the penetrant.

                 Dss = apparent diffusivity of penetrant, 

                  hs = thickness of skin

 

Thus, permeability coefficient (Ps) may be a constant, if Ks, Dss and hs terms in equation (2) are constant under a given set of conditions. A constant rate of drug permeation is achieved if Cd >> Cr, then the equation (1) may be reduced to:

 

Molecular penetration through the various regions of the skin is limited by the diffusional resistances encountered.  The total diffusional resistance (Rskin) to permeation through the skin has been described by Chien as:

 

Where, R is the diffusional resistance and  subscripts sc , e , pd refer to stratum corneum, epidermis and papillary layer of the dermis respectively. Of these layers, the greatest resistance is put up by the stratum corneum and tends to be the rate –limiting step in percutaneous absorption.When more than one phase of the membrane is capable of supporting separate diffusional currents through each. In this instance, the pathways are configured in parallel to one another and the total fluxes of matter across the membrane is the sum of the fluxes of each route and is expressed by :

 

Where,  J = diffusional flux and the term  f1p1 + f2p2 + .fnpn, defines the overall permeability coefficient,  ∆C  being the concentration drop.2,13

 

FACTORS AFFECTING TRANSDERMAL: PERMEABILITY:

The principal transport mechanism across mammalian skin is by passive diffusion through, primarily, the trans-epidermal route at steady state or through trans appendageal route at initial non-steady state. The  factors  controlling  transdermal  permeability  can  be  broadly  placed  in  the following classes.1,11,12

 

i. Physicochemical properties of the penetrant molecule 

(a)  Partition coefficient: 

Drugs possessing lipid and water solubility are favorably absorbed through the skin. Transdermal permeability coefficient shows a linear dependency on partition coefficient. A lipid/water partition coefficient of 1 or greater is generally required for optimal transdermal permeability. 

 

(b) pH conditions:

Application of solutions whose pH values are very high or very low can be destructive to the skin. With moderate pH values, the flux of ionizable drugs can be affected by changes in pH that alter the ratio of charged and uncharged species and their transdermal permeability.

 

(c)  Penetrant  concentration: 

Assuming  membrane  limited  transport,  increasing concentration  of  dissolved  drug  causes  a  proportional  increase  in  flux.  At concentrations higher than the solubility, excess solid drug functions as a reservoir and helps to maintain a constant drug concentration for a prolonged period of time.

 

ii. Physicochemical properties of drug delivery system: Generally, the drug delivery system vehicles do not increase the rate of penetration of a drug into the skin but serve as carriers for the drug.

 

(a) Release characteristics:

Solubility of the drug in the vehicle determines the release rate.

The mechanisms of drug release depend on the following factors.

(i) Whether the drug molecules are dissolved or suspended in the delivery systems.

(ii) The interfacial partition coefficient of the drug from the delivery systems to the skin tissue.

(iii) pH of the vehicle.

 

(b) Composition of drug delivery systems:

The composition of  the drug delivery  system not only affects the rate of drug release, but also the permeability of stratum corneum by means  of  hydration,  mixing  with  skin  lipids  or  other  sorption  promoting  effects. Permeation decreases with polyethylene glycols of low molecular weight. Similarly, methyl salicylate  is more  lipophilic  than  its  parent  acid  and when  applied  to  the  skin,  from  fatty vehicles, the methyl salicylate yielded a higher percutaneous absorption than salicylic acid.

 

(c) Enhancement of transdermal permeation:

Majority of drugs will not penetrate the skin at rates sufficiently high for therapeutic efficacy.  In order to allow clinically useful transdermal   permeation of most drugs, the permeation can be improved by the addition of a sorption or permeation promoter into the drug delivery systems. Such promoters can be of following types:

 

(i) Organic solvents: 

These  agents  cause  an  enhancement  in  the  absorption  of  oil-soluble  drugs,  due  to  the  partial  leaching  of  the  epidermal  liquids,  resulting  in  the  improvement  of  the  skin  conditions  for  wetting  and  for  transepidermal  and  transfollicular  penetration.  e.g.  dimethyl  acetamide,  dimethyl  formamide,  dimethyl sulphoxide,  cineole,  propylene  glycol,  polyethylene  glycol,  ethanol,  tetrahydro furfuryl  alcohol,  cyclohexane,  acetone,  ethyl  ether,  benzene,  and  chloroform.  Dimethyl  sulphoxide has shown permeation promoting effect on a variety of drugs, such as steroids, dyes, iodine, local anesthetics, antibiotics, quaternary ammonium compounds, etc.

 

(ii) Surface active agents:

The permeation promoting activity of surfactants  is assumed to be due  to action  to decrease  the  surface  tension,  to  improve  the wetting of  the skin,  and  to  enhance  the  distribution  of  the  drugs.  Anionic surfactants are the most effective.  Their  action  may  be  due  to  their  modification  of  the  stratum  germinativum and/or  to  their denaturation of  the epidermal proteins. Ex. Sodium lauryl  sulfate and  sodium dioctyl sulfo-succinate.   

 

iii. Physiological and pathological conditions of the skin 

(a) Lipid Film:

The lipid film on the skin surface acts as a protective layer to prevent the removal of moisture from the skin and helps  in maintaining  the barrier function of the  stratum  corneum.  Defatting  of  this  film  was  found  to  decrease  transdermal absorption. 

 

(b) Skin Hydration: 

Hydration  of  the  stratum  corneum  can  enhance  transdermal permeability, although  the degree of penetration enhancement varies  from drug  to drug. Simply  covering  or  occluding  the  skin  with  plastic  sheeting,  leading  to  the accumulation  of  sweat  and  condensed  water  vapor  can  achieve  skin  hydration. Increased  hydration  appears  to  open  up  the  dense,  closely  packed  cells  of  the  skin  and increase its porosity. 

 

(c) Skin Temperature:

Raising skin temperature results in an increase in the rate of skin permeation. This may be due to: 

(i) Thermal energy required for diffusivity. 

(ii) Solubility of drug in skin tissues.

(iii) Increased vasodilatation of skin vessels 

 

(d) Regional Variation:

Differences in the nature and thickness of the barrier layer of the skin causes variation in permeability. 

 

(e) Traumatic / Pathological injuries to the skin:  Injuries that disrupt the continuity of the stratum corneum, increase permeability due to increased vasodilatation caused by removal of

the barrier. 

 

(f) Cutaneous drug metabolism:

Catabolic enzymes present in the viable epidermis may render a drug inactive by metabolism and thus affect the topical bioavailability of the drug.

 

(g) Reservoir effect of the horny layer:

The horny layer, especially its deeper layers, can sometimes act as a depot and modify the transdermal permeation characteristics of some drugs. The reservoir effect is due to the irreversible binding of part of the applied drug with the skin. This binding can be reduced by the pretreatment of the skin surface with anionic surfactants.

 

REGULATORY ISSUES:

The role of any regulatory authority is to ensure a safe and effective medicine. In  the  case  of  transdermal  drug  delivery  a  number  of  issues  need  to  be  considered. They have to take into account the drug, the excipients, and the device. The active has to  be  delivered  at  an  adequate  rate  through  the  skin  and  it  should  have  no  adverse effects on  the skin.  It is surprising how many chemical entities have some degree of skin toxicity, irritancy, or allergenicity. This can be  exacerbated  by  solvents  in  the delivery  system  such  as  those  present  to  solubilize  the medicine  or  to  enhance  its passage through  the  skin.  It  is essential  to  choose  Enhancers   that are  toxicologically  safe  and  do  not  alter  the  barrier function of  the  skin  in  an  irreversible  way.  It is possible for solvents to leach components of the patch, such as plasticizers present in the polymers/adhesives. The safety of these issues needs to be tested carefully.  For  active  delivery  systems  it  is important  to  ensure  that  the  devices  are  capable  of  delivering  the  drug  in  a reproducible  way  to  skin  sites  that  may  vary  considerably  in  permeability characteristics.  Stability is also an area of interest. Often transdermal patches have high drug loads to minimize their surface area. The active is often close to saturation; care  needs  to  be  taken  that  crystallization  on  storage  does  not  influence  the effectiveness  of  the medication.  In  the  case  of  iontophoresis,  the  drug  flux will  be proportional  to  the current. Tests will need to show that constant current is provided over a range of conditions and after storage of the devices.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Barry BW Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci. 21; 2004: 371-377.

2.       Barry B. Transdermal Drug Delivery. In: Aulton ME, Pharmaceutics. The science of dosage form design. 2nd ed, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.499-543.

3.       Berner B., John V.A. "Pharmacokinetic characterisation of transdermal delivery systems". Clinical pharmacokinetics. 26(2); 1994:121–34

4.       Boylan J. “Transdermal Drug Delivery Devices:  System Design and Composition” In Swarbrick J. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology: Volume 18, New York : Informa healthcare, 309 – 337

5.       Chandrashekhar NS, Shobha Rani R H. Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Drug Selection and Loading of Transdermal Drug Delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 70(1); 2008: 9496

6.       Chien Yie.W. Development of Transdermal drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm.13;1987,589-651

7.       Gaur  PK, Mishra  S,  Purohit  S,  Dave  K. Transdermal  Drug  Delivery  System:  A Review.  Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2 (1); 2009: 1420.

8.       Jalwal P, Jangra1 A, Dahiya  L.  Sangwan  Y, Saroha  R. A Review on Transdermal Patches. The Pharma Research. 3;2010: 139149

9.       Loyd, V., Allen, Jr., Nicholas, G., Howard. C, Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems, In  Ansels  Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms  and Drug Delivery Systems, Chapter  11  :. Churchill Livingstone, pp. 298 – 315

10.     Misra, AN, Transdermal drug delivery. In: Jain NK, editor. Controlled and novel drug delivery. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 2004. pp 101-17.

11.     Murthy, S.N. Hiremath. Transdermal Drug Delivery systems.  In: Hiremath SRR,editor. Text book of industrial pharmacy. India; Orient longman private limited, 2008, Pp. 27-49,

12.     Robert.L.B. & Howard.I.M.. Percutaneous Absorptions. 2nd ed., 1989, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc

13.     Tortora G.J. The Integumentary system. In: Tortora G.J and Grabowski SR. Principle of Anatomy and Physiology, Harpercollins College Publishers, USA 10th ed.:1996, pp140-145.

14.     Wadher  K,  Kalsail  R,  Umekar  M. Alternate  Drug  Delivery  System:  Recent Advancement  and  Future  Challenges.  Arch Pharm Sci& Res 2009; 1: 297.

15.     Waugh A and Grant A. The Skin. In: Ross and Wilson Anatomy and Physiology in health and illness, Churchill Livingstone, 10th ed.; 2006, pp 358-367,

16.     William AC and Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004; 603-618 Available at http://en. wikipedia.org/ wiki/skin.

 

Received on 11.09.2012

Modified on 02.10.2012

Accepted on 09.10.2012           

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech.  4(5): September –October, 2012: 213-219