Author(s): Hisham A. Abbas, Fathy M. Serry, Eman M. EL-Masry

Email(s): h_abdelmonem@yahoo.com

DOI: Not Available

Address: Hisham A. Abbas*, Fathy M. Serry, Eman M. EL-Masry
Department of Microbiology and Immunology-Faculty of Pharmacy- Zagazig University- Zagazig- Egypt
*Corresponding Author:

Published In:   Volume - 4,      Issue - 5,     Year - 2012


ABSTRACT:
This study was performed to detect biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa by qualitative and quantitative methods. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were tested for their ability to form biofilm by the tube method, the spectrophotometric and the viable count methods. Sixteen isolates (69.6%) were strong biofilm forming; two isolates (8.7%) were moderate biofilm forming, while five isolates (21.7%) were weak biofilm forming by both the tube and spectrophotometric methods. On the other hand, the viable count method was poorly correlated with either of the tube and spectrophotometric methods. High viable counts were recorded for biofilms formed by thirteen isolates (56.5%), one of which was moderate biofilm forming by the spectrophotometric method. Intermediate viable counts were found for biofilms formed by seven isolates (30.4%) including three strong biofilm forming isolates by the tube method, four strong biofilm forming isolates by the spectrophotometric method and two moderate biofilm forming isolates by both the spectrophotometric and the tube methods. This discrepancy of results may be attributed to the fact that, the matrix material and dead cells, in addition to the viable cells, are measured by the tube and spectrophotometric method, while the viable count method detects only viable cells within the biofilm.


Cite this article:
Hisham A. Abbas, Fathy M. Serry, Eman M. EL-Masry . Comparative assessment of biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates by crystal violet assay and viable count assay. Research J. Science and Tech. 2012; 4(5): 181-184 .


Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Leena Sahu, Amit Roy, Trilochan Satapathy

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sachin S. Rajmane, Sushil R. Mathpati, Jairaj K. Dawle

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2016.00024.3:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Tara Chand, Manoj Kr. Sharma, Fanish Kr. Pandey, Chaitali Chakraborty

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2016.00017.6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Karimoun Massalatchi Illyassou, Mamane Illa, Rabani Adamou, Aboubacar Maitournam, Abdou Baoua

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2018.00006.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Vishal Khilari, Akash Phadatare, Aman Samarth

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2017.00115.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): C. Uma Devi, R. Bhuvana Vijaya

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2017.00070.5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Chirag A. Patel, Dhrubo Jyoti Sen, Aniket R. Patel

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Hisham A. Abbas, Fathy M. Serry, Eman M. EL-Masry

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sachin Aglawe, Amol Gayke, Prasad Murade, Prashant Swami, Pramod Game, Pratik Kadam, Shubham Kanawade, Yogesh Garud

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2019.00040.8         Access: Closed Access Read More

Author(s): Nikam Pooja, Baokar Shrikrishna, Undare Santosh, Patil R.N

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2016.00001.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Kavitha K, Bindu Sree K, Jaya Preethi P, Pavan Kumar K, Rajvel R, Sivakumar T.

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sandhya Mittal, Nidhi Rao, Sudhanshu, Ekta Menghani

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Kishu Tripathi, T. Siva Kumar

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Research Journal of Science and Technology (RJST) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, devoted to science and technology...... Read more >>>

RNI: Not Available                     
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988 


Recent Articles




Tags