Author(s): Gauri Bhutada, Abhishek A. Telang, Vaishnavi Yadav

Email(s): gauribhu1998@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00030   

Address: Gauri Bhutada1, Abhishek A. Telang2, Vaishnavi Yadav3
1Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe),Wardha-442001.
2Final Year Undergraduate Student, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001.
3Associate Professor, Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College,Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 3,     Year - 2025


ABSTRACT:
The common musculoskeletal disorder known as knee osteoarthritis (OA) is marked by a decreased range of motion (ROM), joint discomfort, and limited functional ability. Although traditional exercise therapy is still the mainstay of managing osteoarthritis, improving outcomes is frequently the goal of supplementary therapies. One possible supplementary strategy that has gained traction is Pulse electromagnetic field therapy or PEMF. This review examines the effects of PEMF therapy in conjunction with conventional exercises on pain, knee ROM, and functional activities in knee OA patients. We explore recent evidence, discuss mechanisms, and evaluate the clinical relevance of combining traditional workouts with PEMF treatment.


Cite this article:
Gauri Bhutada, Abhishek A. Telang, Vaishnavi Yadav. Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Combined With Traditional Exercises on Knee Osteoarthritis Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Activities- A Review Article. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2025; 17(3):220-4. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00030

Cite(Electronic):
Gauri Bhutada, Abhishek A. Telang, Vaishnavi Yadav. Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Combined With Traditional Exercises on Knee Osteoarthritis Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Activities- A Review Article. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2025; 17(3):220-4. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00030   Available on: https://rjstonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-17-3-4


REFERENCES:
1.    McCarthy CJ, Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA. Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducingthe pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder. 2006; 51: 1–5. doi:10.1186/s1471-2474-7-51
2.    Pipitone N, Scott DL.  Magnetic pulse treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2001; 17: 190–196. doi:10.1185/s03007-990-391170-61
3.    Thamsborg G, Florescu A, Oturai P, Fallentin E, Tritsaris K, Dissingi S. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with pulsed electromagnetic fields: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005; 13: 575–581.doi:10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.012
4.    Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Dyer RH Jr, Fielding LP, Miner WK, Markoll R.  A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsedelectromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993; 20: 456–460
5.    Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Markoll R.  The effect of pulsedelectromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the kneeand cervical spine. Report of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21: 1903–1911
6.    Trock DH. Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis ClinNorth Am. 2000; 26: 51–62
7.    Zizic TM, Hoffman KC, Holt PA, Hungerford DS, O’Dell JR, Jacobs MA et al. The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation. J Rheumatol. 1995; 9: 1757–1761
8.    Sharma L. Nonpharmacologic management of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002; 14: 603–607
9.    Ciombor DM, Lester G, Aaron RK, Neame P, Caterson B. Low frequency EMFregulates chondrocyte differentiation and expression of matrix proteins. J Orthop Res. 2002; 1:40–50. doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(01)00071-7
10.    Ay S, Evcik D. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2009; 29: 663–666.doi:10.1007/s00296-008-0754-x
11.    Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM, Schwartz Z, Simon BJ. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop. 2004; 419: 30–37
12.    Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen 1. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.  Med Libr Assoc. 2018, 106: 531-41. 10,5195/jmla.2018.285
13.    Matos AP, Pegorari MS. How to classify clinical trials using the PE Dro scale?. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020; 11: 1-2. 10.15171/jlms.2020.01
14.    Felson, D.T., Lawrence, R.C., Dieppe, P.A., et al. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 2000; 43(3): 629-633.
15.    Kulkarni, A., Coggon, D., and Palmer, K.T. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2007; 8: 122.

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Varsha N. Tambe, Priyanka S. Jadhav, Avinash N. Tambe

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2020.00047.9         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Someshwar D. Mankar, Abhijit S. Navale, Suraj R. Kadam

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2021.00042         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Hiranshi Arunbhai Patel, Anuradha Prajapati, Sachin Narkhede, Shailesh Luhar

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00008         Access: Closed Access Read More

Research Journal of Science and Technology (RJST) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, devoted to science and technology...... Read more >>>

RNI: Not Available                     
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988 


Recent Articles




Tags