ABSTRACT:
The thermal degradation behaviour and degradation kinetics of polyamide 6(PA6) composites containing guanidine sulfamate–based flame-retardant systems were investigated using thermogravimetric techniques. Thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) measurements were performed in air at a constant heating rate of 10 °C min?¹ to evaluate degradation pathways, decomposition rates, and char-forming behaviour. The incorporation of flame-retardant additives alters the degradation pathway of PA6 by initiating early decomposition while enhancing thermal stability at elevated temperatures through improved char development. The GS–DP system exhibits effective condensed-phase action, with maximum char formation achieved at an OH:S ratio of 0.92, whereas the addition of montmorillonite reduces char yield due to its catalytic influence on polymer degradation. In contrast, the GS–OP system shows the most effective flame-retardant performance, producing the highest char residue through the combined action of condensed-phase stabilization and gas-phase inhibition. Thermal degradation kinetics was evaluated using model-based Coats–Redfern, Broido, and Horowitz–Metzger methods applied to single-heating-rate TG data. Kinetic analysis indicates that the degradation of PA6 and its composites follows a first-order reaction mechanism, with reduced activation energy values for flame-retarded systems reflecting facilitated yet controlled degradation that favours efficient char formation. Overall, the results demonstrate that flame-retardant formulation and its influence on degradation kinetics play a critical role in improving the fire resistance of PA6 composites.
Cite this article:
Sweety Monga. Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Polyamide 6 Composites containing Sulphur- and Phosphorus-based Flame Retardants. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2026; 18(2):127-7. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2026.00018
Cite(Electronic):
Sweety Monga. Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Polyamide 6 Composites containing Sulphur- and Phosphorus-based Flame Retardants. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2026; 18(2):127-7. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2026.00018 Available on: https://rjstonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-18-2-1
6. REFERENCES:
1. Chen H, Hu Y, Li Y, Yang P, Fan S. Research progress in halogen-free flame-retardant nylon 6 fiber. J Ind Text. 2025; 55: 15280837251379261. doi:10.1177/15280837251379261
2. Fu X, Yao C, Yang G. Recent advances in graphene/polyamide 6 composites: a review. RSC Adv. 2015; 5(76): 61688-61702. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/ra/c5ra09312k
3. Guo X, Liu L, Feng H, Li D, Xia Z, Yang R. Flame retardancy of nylon 6 fibers: a review. Polymers. 2023; 15(9): 2161. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/9/2161
4. Kashiwagi T, Harris Jr RH, Zhang X, et al. Flame retardant mechanism of polyamide 6–clay nanocomposites. Polymer. 2004; 45(3):881-891. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032386103010772
5. Levchik GF, Levchik SV, Lesnikovich AI. Mechanisms of action in flame retardant reinforced nylon 6. Polym Degrad Stab. 1996; 54(2-3): 361-363. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141391096000638
6. Levchik SV, Levchik GF, Camino G, Costa L, Lesnikovich AI. Mechanism of Action of Phosphorus-based Flame Retardants in Nylon 6. III. Ammonium Polyphosphate/Manganese Dioxide. Fire Mater. 1996; 20(4): 183-190. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199607)20:4<183::AID-FAM574>3.0.CO; 2-W
7. Lewin M, Zhang J, Pearce E, Gilman J. Flammability of polyamide 6 using the sulfamate system and organo‐layered silicate. Polym Adv Technol. 2007; 18(9): 737-745. doi:10.1002/pat.964
8. Lu H, Wu M, Yang K, Chen R, He Z, Chen X. Research Progress and Application Prospects of Reactive Flame‐Retardant Polyamide. Macromol Chem Phys. 2025; 226(18):e00499. doi:10.1002/macp.202400499
9. Morgan AB, Wilkie CA. Flame Retardant Polymer Nanocomposites. John Wiley and Sons; 2007. Accessed July 26, 2025. https://books.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=LAmOb4p8IwICandoi=fndandpg=PR5anddq=Morgan, +A.B., +%26+Wilkie, +C.A.+(2007).+Flame+Retardant+Polymer+Nanocomposites.+Wiley.andots=iZNH9JqiWyandsig=c6yL0ksE3ZOz-9HyxHebwyb5v0U
10. Wang S, Lim QF, Toh JPW, et al. A versatile, highly effective intumescent flame-retardant synergist for polypropylene and polyamide 6 composites. Compos Commun. 2023; 42:101699. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452213923002073
11. Wang Y, Cui L, Zhang J, et al. Fire Retardant Treatments for Polyamide 6 and 66: Advances and Trends over the Last Five Years. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2025; 7(8):4677-4693. doi:10.1021/acsapm.5c00291
12. Dasari A, Yu ZZ, Mai YW, Liu S. Flame retardancy of highly filled polyamide 6/clay nanocomposites. Nanotechnology. 2007; 18(44):445602. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-4484/18/44/445602/meta
13. Dahiya JB, Rathi S, Bockhorn H, Haußmann M, Kandola BK. The combined effect of organic phoshphinate/ammonium polyphosphate and pentaerythritol on thermal and fire properties of polyamide 6-clay nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab. 2012; 97(8):1458-1465. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141391012001772
14. Levchik SV, Costa L, Camino G. Effect of the fire-retardant, ammonium polyphosphate, on the thermal decomposition of aliphatic polyamides: Part II—polyamide 6. Polym Degrad Stab. 1992; 36(3): 229-237. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014139109290060I
15. Conesa JA, Marcilla A, Caballero JA, Font R. Comments on the validity and utility of the different methods for kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2001; 58: 617-633. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237000001303
16. Dahiya JB, Kumar K. Nanoclay as Thermal Barrier in Coating Intumescent Formulations for Flame Retardant Cotton Fabric. Asian J Res Chem. 2010; 3(4): 1007-1010. Accessed July 31, 2025. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajrcandvolume=3andissue=4andarticle=045
17. Dinesh Sirohi, Pratibha Singh, K. N. Pandey, Vishal Verma, Vijai Kumar, A. K. Saxena. Thermal and morphological behavior of PEEK/PEI blends with polyphosphazene coated carbon nanotube. Asian J Res Chem. 2012; 5(5): 650-654. Accessed August 15, 2025. https://scispace.com/papers/thermal-and-morphological-behavior-of-peek-pei-blends-with-21jmn2d0yv
18. Gopalakrishnan S, Sujatha R. Studies on Bio-Based Polyurethanes-Thermal and Mechanical Properties. Asian J Res Chem. 2011; 4(2): 322-328.
19. Monga S, Dahiya JB. Effect of Ammonium Polyphosphate in Combination with Zinc Phosphate and Zinc Borate on Thermal Degradation and Flame Retardation of Polyamide 6/Clay Nanocomposites. Asian J Res Chem. 2015; 8(1):39-45. Accessed July 31, 2025. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajrcandvolume=8andissue=1andarticle=009
20. Murhakar GH, Raut AR. Thermal Study of Modified Polyvinyl Alcohol Conjugates and Doped Modified Polyvinyl Alcohol Conjugates. Asian J Res Chem. 2014; 7(11):925-928.
21. Nehra S, Dahiya JB, Kumar S. Effect of nanoclays on thermal and flame retardant properties of intumescent coated cotton fabric. Asian J Res Chem. 2013; 6(7): 676-682. Accessed July 31, 2025. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajrcandvolume=6andissue=7andarticle=015
22. Priyanka, Dahiya JB. Phosphorylated epoxy nanocomposites: Study of structure and mechanical properties. Asian J Res Chem. 2017; 10(3):319. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2017.00053.0
23. Reddy MJ, Reddy MR, Subrahmanyam AR, Reddy MM, Raor ASS. Effect of LiClO4 Concentration on Structural, morphological and Thermal Properties of PMMA and PEO Polymer Blends. Asian J Res Chem. 2018; 11(2): 463. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2018.00084.6
24. Shubha, Dahiya JB. Effect of Surfactants on Coating of Phosphorus-Containing Polymeric Film on Cotton Fabric and Study of Flammability Behaviour. Asian J Res Chem. 2017; 10(5): 680. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2017.00115.8
25. Dodd JW, Tonge KH, King JM. Thermal methods (Analytical chemistry by open learning). Anal Chim Acta. 1989; 221: 370-370.
26. Haq ZU, Khattak AK, Khan Z, Khan FU, Ather A, Khan SU. Thermal gravimetric analysis of fiber glass. Asian J Res Chem. 2016; 9(1): 22. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2016.00004.3
27. Hatakeyama T, Quinn F i. Thermal Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications to Polymer Science. [sl]; 1999. Accessed July 26, 2025. http://www.dl.iranchembook.ir/ebook/polymer-1916.pdf
28. Ng HM, Saidi NM, Omar FS, Ramesh K, Ramesh S, Bashir S. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Polymers. In: Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2018: 1-29. doi:10.1002/0471440264.pst667
29. Zainal NFA, Saiter JM, Halim SIA, Lucas R, Chan CH. Thermal analysis: basic concept of differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry for beginners. Chem Teach Int. 2021; 3(2): 59-75. doi:10.1515/cti-2020-0010
30. Thermal Analysis Tools. In: Thermal Analysis of Polymeric Materials. Springer-Verlag. 2005: 279-454. doi:10.1007/3-540-26360-8_4
31. Brown ME, ed. Reaction Kinetics from Thermal Analysis. In: Introduction to Thermal Analysis. Vol 1. Hot Topics in Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004: 181-214. doi:10.1007/0-306-48404-8_10
32. Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature. 1964; 201(4914):68-69. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.nature.com/articles/201068a0
33. Monga S, Dahiya JB. Kinetic study of non-isothermal degradation of PA6 composites containing flame retardant additives. Asian J Res Chem. 2015; 8(11): 683. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2015.00109.1
34. Broido A. A simple, sensitive graphical method of treating thermogravimetric analysis data. J Polym Sci Part -2 Polym Phys. 1969; 7(10): 1761-1773. doi:10.1002/pol.1969.160071012
35. Horowitz HH, Metzger Gershon. A New Analysis of Thermogravimetric Traces. Anal Chem. 1963; 35(10): 1464-1468. doi:10.1021/ac60203a013
36. Lewin M, Brozek J, Martens MM. The system polyamide/sulfamate/dipentaerythritol: flame retardancy and chemical reactions. Polym Adv Technol. 2002; 13(10-12): 1091-1102. doi:10.1002/pat.243
37. Monga Sweety, Dahiya Jai Bhagwan. Effect of lithium salt and plasticizer on processing and flammability of PA6/sulfamate/nanoclay composites - Google Search. Research Review Journals. 2018; 3(10): 319-327. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1465499
38. Ramani A, Dahoe AE. On flame retardancy in polycaprolactam composites by aluminium diethylphosphinate and melamine polyphosphate in conjunction with organically modified montmorillonite nanoclay. Polym Degrad Stab. 2014; 105: 1-11. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141391014001128
39. Levchik SV, Balabanovich AI, Levchik GF, Costa L. Effect of Melamine and its Salts on Combustion and Thermal Decomposition of Polyamide 6. Fire Mater. 1997; 21(2):75-83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199703)21:2<75::AID-FAM597>3.0.CO; 2-P
40. Jahromi S, Gabriëlse W, Braam A. Effect of melamine polyphosphate on thermal degradation of polyamides: a combined X-ray diffraction and solid-state NMR study. Polymer. 2003; 44(1): 25-37. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032386102006869
41. Twarowski A. The influence of phosphorus oxides and acids on the rate of H+ OH recombination. Combust Flame. 1993; 94(1-2): 91-107. Accessed January 7, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001021809390022U