Author(s):
M Sai Prasadh, Anuradha Prajapati, Sachin B. Narkhede, Shailesh Luhar, Jaydeep Anil Suryawanshi
Email(s):
gr8saiprasadh@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00040 
Address:
M Sai Prasadh¹*, Anuradha Prajapati, Sachin B. Narkhede, Shailesh Luhar, Jaydeep Anil Suryawanshi
Smt. B.N.B Swaminarayan Pharmacy College, Salvav - Vapi, Gujarat, 396191.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 17,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2025
ABSTRACT:
Throat cancer, particularly laryngeal carcinoma, often necessitates total laryngectomy, resulting in the loss of natural voice. Artificial larynx devices have emerged as transformative solutions to restore speech in such patients. Over the decades, significant advancements have been made in the design, mechanism, material, and user adaptability of these devices. This review article highlights the evolution of artificial larynx technology, compares different types, explores recent innovations like smart voice synthesis and biocompatible implants, and discusses patient outcomes. It also emphasizes challenges and future directions for improving speech quality and life quality post-laryngectomy.
Cite this article:
M Sai Prasadh, Anuradha Prajapati, Sachin B. Narkhede, Shailesh Luhar, Jaydeep Anil Suryawanshi. Advances in Artificial Larynx Devices for Voice Restoration in Throat Cancer Patients. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2025; 17(4):288-6. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00040
Cite(Electronic):
M Sai Prasadh, Anuradha Prajapati, Sachin B. Narkhede, Shailesh Luhar, Jaydeep Anil Suryawanshi. Advances in Artificial Larynx Devices for Voice Restoration in Throat Cancer Patients. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2025; 17(4):288-6. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00040 Available on: https://rjstonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-17-4-5
REFERENCES:
1. Ward EC, van As-Brooks CJ. Head and Neck Cancer: Treatment, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes. Plural Publishing; 2014.
2. Patel R, Roy N. Technological developments in voice prosthesis: A clinical review. Int J Biomed Eng Technol. 2021; 35(2): 145–160.
3. Palmer AD, Smith L, Kumar R, Lee M. Patient satisfaction with electrolarynx devices: A systematic review. J Voice. 2022; 36(1): 112.e1–112.e9.
4. Ramya B, Sridhar N, Kumar V, Thomas S. Recent trends in artificial larynx development: Challenges and opportunities. Biomed Eng Lett. 2023; 13(1): 31–41.
5. Sayed SI, Badran K. Advances in voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Indian J Cancer. 2013; 50(3): 262–268.
6. Toner MA, Shipp T. Differences in the vocal quality of tracheoesophageal, electrolaryngeal, and esophageal speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35(6): 1345–1350.
7. Yuce T, Gunhan K, Ozer E. Current and future trends in total laryngectomy rehabilitation: A review. J Laryngol Voice. 2018; 8(1): 8–14.
8. Deschler DG, Blevins NH. Surgical Techniques in Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2012.
9. Op de Coul BMR, Hilgers FJM, Balm AJM, et al. A decade of post-laryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: A single institution’s experience with consistent application of prosthetic voice rehabilitation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126(11): 1320–1328.
10. Goldstein, D. P., and Gilbert, R. W. Voice and speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2009; 42(4): 675–689.
11. Bunting, G. W. Innovations in alaryngeal voice restoration. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2004; 12(3): 161–166.
12. Danker, H., Wolff, A., Hertrampf, K., and Dietz, A. (). The impact of laryngectomy on speech and quality of life: A longitudinal study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2010; 267(3): 451–456.
13. Herrmann, I. F., Hess, M., and Bloching, M. B. (). Advances in electrolarynx speech: Towards more intelligible and natural-sounding speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2012; 64(3): 114–121.
14. Eadie TL, Doyle PC. Quality of life in voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 133(4): 500–507.
15. Robbins J, Fisher HB, Blom ED. Speech outcomes following laryngectomy: Clinical perspectives. Laryngoscope. 2020; 130(3): 482–489.